[High-Res]
The numbers are taken from the most recent data from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators on female labor force participation rates, but to be honest, I find 25% a very low percentage for Lebanese women. You check out the original article [here].
That’s a jargony way of measuring the percentage of women ages 15 and up who are employed. The higher this number, the better for women (economic self-sufficiency, or at least the potential to be economically self-sufficient, is closely linked with all sorts of other basic rights) and the better for countries. Any country where it’s hard for women to work, whether because they’re pressured to stay home or because educational attainment is tougher or just because of straight-up discrimination, is effectively suppressing half of its economic potential. That makes everybody poorer and worse off. [WashingtonPost]
They are counting working women of age 15 and 16?!? No wonder the numbers don’t make sense.
It doesn’t seem accurate, as you mentioned, 25% seems too low for Lebanon. As if this -as in many publications and “statistics” by world leaders- is just to make developing countries, arabs, etc seem more and more radical and backwards.